• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

Council wrap-up: Snow removal, fluoride and committees

City council

City council

Tyler Clarke
Published on January 18, 2013
Published on January 18, 2013
Tyler Clarke  RSS Feed

Throughout this week, the Daily Herald has reported on various items brought up during Monday’s city council meeting.
The following are a handful of issues that remained unreported, as discussed during the meeting. 

Topics :
College of Dental Surgeons , Prince Albert , University of Saskatchewan , Western Europe

Sidewalk snow removal

The city’s elected officials have decided to not pursue a bylaw that fines residents who do not remove snow from their stretch of sidewalk.

Instead, voluntary compliance will continue to be sought -- an approach that appears to be working, Coun. Martin Ring said.

“It’s been a tough year,” he said. “We’ve seen an excessive amount of snow -- double what we saw last season, already, and for the most part, within my ward, I can walk around quite easily on the sidewalks.”

The city’s Golden Shovel Awards campaign will continue to be promoted, wherein residents can nominate neighbours who excel at removing snow from not only their stretch of sidewalk, but also others’.

Nomination forms are available at City Hall or online at www.citypa.ca.

The city also needs to lead by example, Coun. Rick Orr said, noting that some stretches of sidewalk in front of city-owned buildings aren’t shoveled to an acceptable degree.

Another area that needs looking at is with vehicles remaining parked in snow removal zones, Mayor Greg Dionne said, with the city required to provide notice before towing vehicles.

“I propose that over the summer we re-work our snow removal bylaw, that we immediately take a picture of it … and we tow it,” he said. “It’s our own bylaw that causes our own bylaw officers grief.”

 

Fluoride opposition

Reiterating the decision they’d tentatively made during the previous week’s executive committee meeting, city council wants more information before making a decision on fluoride.

At question is local health advocate Maureen Logue’s request that the city continue to not inject fluoride in the city’s drinking water -- something they haven’t done for about a year, due to ongoing renovations.

“In Europe, 97 per cent of Western Europe does not fluoridate, and hopefully you all received the information that I sent you,” Logue told council.

Wanting additional information to show both sides of the coin, Coun. Martin Ring motioned for city administration to seek additional information from the Prince Albert Parkland Health Region and the College of Dental Surgeons at the University of Saskatchewan.

It’s been a tough year. We’ve seen an excessive amount of snow -- double what we saw last season, already, and for the most part, within my ward, I can walk around quite easily on the sidewalks. - Coun. Martin Ring

“I can certainly provide some names to the city clear of people I know that I have been in contact with,” he said.

“It’s not to be disrespectful to our presenter here tonight, but when you do start looking up fluoridated water, there are many differing opinions on it, and when you look at Health Canada, they are certainly still in favour of putting fluoride in water.”

 

Committee retooling

Taking the first step toward a retooling of the city’s committee system, a lengthy motion was made on Monday, outlining numerous changes.

Making their death march were the following committees council agreed to dissolve: Street Naming Advisory Committee, Transit Advisory Committee, Beautification Committee, Municipal Enterprise Zone Committee, and the Prince Albert Golf and Curling Club Liaison Committee.

The Community Services Advisory Committee was originally slated to lose council representation, but council opted instead to listen to the organization’s executive director Marv Bender, who made a presentation during Monday’s meeting.

“We think, from our perspective, that having had appointments from city council to our organization has been very, very helpful for us,” he told council.

Responding to this and other potential requests, Coun. Lee Atkinson noted that no matter what they do, it’s never in stone.

“Basically, any of the committees that we are not resurrecting on this list have the option of doing that,” he said.

Among the lengthy list of changes is the new requirement that every committee, commission and board submit an annual report to City Council by Dec. 1 of every year for review. They must also submit a work plan for approval by City Council by April 1 of each year, lest they dissolve as organization. 

Comments

  • Username
    Born and raised in PA
    - January 21, 2013 at 14:46:50

    Seriously, we all know that U of A, Doctors, Health Canada, and Dentists will all agree fluoride is good to have in our water but there are so WRONG!!! Fluoride is: an industrial waste added to the drinking water by our government for thepurpose of medication, more toxic than lead, the active ingredient in many pesticides, and linked to increasese in bone cancer, brain damage, and lower IQs.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Richard Hudon
    - January 21, 2013 at 11:42:39

    What surprises me the most is that any health authority or even health bureaucrat would support putting an additive in the water supply that is a known violent, general protoplasmic poison such as Fluoride (F-). Even a high school student taking a chemistry course knows that. Steel burns white hot in the presence of Fluoride. It's supposed to prevent tooth decay? Come on, give me a break. James Reeves nailed it, thank you James... The Journal of the American Dental Association, Volume 23, page 568, April, 1936, titled Fluorine in relation to bone and tooth development by Floyd DeEds, Phd admits openly to that fact. The Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept 18, 1943, Editorial, says: "Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons.”

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    James Reeves
    - January 19, 2013 at 01:07:32

    The proof of the pudding is in the eating, as they say. Many of the U.S. states with the longest fluoridation, many over 50 years, have by far the worst teeth. How is that possible if fluoride protects teeth? Consider the following states: Kentucky, which has been 100% fluoridated for over 40 years. Government records show that Kentucky leads the nation in the number of dental cavities in children, and in the number of completely toothless adults. The same ineffectiveness is evident in many states and cities, such as West Virginia, Washington D.C., Boston, Detroit, etc. Fluoridated Chicago 3rd graders tooth decay rates increased from 59% to 63% in recent years. (2004 – 2009) and their untreated tooth decay went from 32% to 36%. West Virginia is 92% fluoridated for many years and comes near last place in the nation with 38% toothless. But look at Hawaii: with the lowest fluoridation rate (9%), Hawaii has the lowest rate of toothless residents in the US (10%). This shows the absolute ineffectiveness of fluoridation. _______________________________________________

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising