• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (0)
  •  

Hefty cleanup bill for chemical leak

City manager Robert Cotterill explains during Monday’s city council meeting why Envirotec Services Inc. was hired to clean up a chemical leak at the water treatment plant in December.  Herald photo by Tyler Clarke

City manager Robert Cotterill explains during Monday’s city council meeting why Envirotec Services Inc. was hired to clean up a chemical leak at the water treatment plant in December. 

Tyler Clarke
Published on January 15, 2013
Published on January 15, 2013
Tyler Clarke  RSS Feed

More than a month after a chemical leak at Prince Albert’s water treatment plant, the city’s elected officials are facing a hefty cleanup bill.

Topics :
Prince Albert , Envirotec Services , Fire Department , Prince Albert

More than a month after a chemical leak at Prince Albert’s water treatment plant, the city’s elected officials are facing a hefty cleanup bill.

Immediately following a chemical spill of caustic soda on Dec. 10, city manager Robert Cotterill authorized the hiring of Envirotec Services Inc. at a cost of $101,237.

“We needed to remove the caustic soda immediately,” he explained during Monday’s city council meeting.

What about the Prince Albert Fire Department’s services, Coun. Charlene Miller asked.

“The volume of the material that we were dealing with, we did not have any equipment within the city to be able to handle that,” Cotterill responded.

“We also had to dispose of it when we were finished, and I must say that we were within 15 minutes of having a major problem at the plant, so the decision that we made at the time was the right decision.”

The caustic soda was removed before it created problem, Cotterill noted.

“I think with a dollar amount this large, there are some questions, and I guess I’d like to see that reflected in your report,” Coun. Ted Zurakowski said. “We should know where that money’s coming from.”

Mayor Greg Dionne said that any funds would come out of the water treatment plant’s budget, though the implications of this expenditure on the budget process has yet to be determined.

“We do have insurance … with the contractor, so we will be dealing with the contractor,” Cotterill said.

Although the city must pay the initial bill, the city is “certainly in discussion” with the contractor over payment, he clarified after the meeting.

What Dionne wanted council to consider while looking over the cost is the magnitude of the spill.

“It was not a small amount,” he said. “The fire department is adjusted for small spills, but when it comes to tens of thousands of gallons, they’re not equipped to handle that.”

The spilled material ran into the water treatment plant’s containment area, preventing major environmental implications.

The spill was triggered by an employee bumping a pipe with his head. He was showered and taken to the hospital after the incident, though he asked not to go.

The crew was at the water treatment plant to assess some remedial work that the city identified as being unacceptable, Cotterill explained in December.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising