• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

Sask. Party has ‘abandoned’ Prince Albert’s need for a second bridge: Belanger

Daily Herald Daily Herald

Daily Herald

Alex Di Pietro
Published on March 7, 2013
Published on March 7, 2013
Alex Di Pietro  RSS Feed

The debate for a second bridge in Prince Albert continued at the Saskatchewan Legislative Building on Thursday.

Topics :
Prince Albert , Sask. Party , Chamber of Commerce , Northern Saskatchewan

During question period, Athabasca MLA Buckley Belanger asserted that the Sask. Party was being ignorant of Prince Albert’s need for a new bridge, citing that the campaign to do so had received tremendous support.

“That campaign was backed up by the Chamber of Commerce, the RMs around the city, and of course, all the people who live in and around Prince Albert,” he said.

“The Sask. Party Government has totally abandoned Prince Albert and they refuse to listen to all of the voices calling for a second bridge,” Belanger continued. “Mr. Speaker, Why has the Sask. Party abandoned the city of Prince Albert and refused even to consider building that second bridge?”

Don McMorris, minister of highways and infrastructure, responded by saying it was “recycle day.”

“We’ve answered a number of these questions, whether it’s in (agriculture) or highways before, but we’ll take another shot at it,” he said.

McMorris cited the Stantec report that deemed a second bridge as unnecessary for the immediate future and claimed the Diefenbaker Bridge has a lifespan of another 25 years.

“It wasn't driven by the Ministry of Highways or any of the municipalities. It was a joint study, combined to cover whether a second bridge was needed in Prince Albert,” he said. “That study came back, Mr. Speaker. It says that the bridge right now, as it is, will serve the needs of that area for a number of years.”

Belanger took offence to McMorris calling the second bridge initiative a “recycled project,” noting that it is “a very important issue for the entire northern part of our province and for that region.”

He also criticized Prince Albert-Carlton MLA Darryl Hickie and Prince Albert-Northcote MLA Victoria Jurgens, both of the Sask. Party, for being too passive on the topic, quoting Jurgens as being supportive of a second bridge in 2011.

“Since then, those local Sask. Party MLAs hid in their bunkers so they wouldn’t have to repeat their record,” Belanger said. “The member from Prince Albert-Carlton told a local paper, ‘While pre-election and during the election campaign, I was very strong on that second bridge for Prince Albert.’

“Why won’t the two members from Prince Albert stand up for their constituents and support that second bridge for Prince Albert and region?” Belanger asked.

McMorris said he found it “very curious” that Belanger and the Saskatchewan NDP would be so fervently behind a second bridge, claiming that, as the former minister of highways, Belanger did “nothing for northern Saskatchewan.”

“In fact, in Prince Albert, they tore apart the bridge, and they wouldn’t even repave it,” he said. 

alex.dipietro@paherald.sk.ca

Comments

  • Username
    DM
    - March 21, 2013 at 00:31:22

    The Sask Party is going to lose a lot of votes in the Prince Albert area come next election time. The Sask Party position on the bridge is a gift to the NDP. Since when are bridges only built when their life span is at an end? Isn't that a little late, especially given the poor condition of this bridge? If the politicians in Regina could/would look at the bridge, they would see why it's time for a new one. Also, what would happen if and when this bridge again fails, like it did two years ago? How are we supposed to cross the river? In boats in the summer, or on the ice in the winter?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    KT
    - March 7, 2013 at 16:53:49

    Isn't stantec the company that gave the bridge passing grades when in all actuallity was ready to fall into the river?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising